John Deere 8400 or Massey Ferguson MF 8280 A?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8400 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 8280 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for John Deere 8400 and Massey Ferguson MF 8280 A, with the call on each
Question8400MF 8280 ACall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?191.4 kW (256.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8400”191.4 kW (256.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8280”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8400 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 8280 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8400 and the MF 8280 A.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8400 and the MF 8280 A.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—153.6 L/min (40.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8280”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 8400.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,900 kg (10,803 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8400”10,401 kg (22,931 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8280”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 8400: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8400”); the MF 8280 A: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8280”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?8,705 kg (19,191 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8400”9,770 kg (21,539 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8280”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 8280A is 12% heavier (1,065 kg / 2,348 lb) than the John Deere 8400 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8400”14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8280”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8400”18Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8280”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8400 and the MF 8280 A.
Which is faster on the road?38 km/h (23.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8400”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8280”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8400”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8280”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 8280A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 8400 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8400”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8280”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8400”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8280”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1994–19981999–2002Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 8280A is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson 8280A is 12% heavier (1,065 kg / 2,348 lb) than the John Deere 8400 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 8280A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 8400 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Massey Ferguson 8280A is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8400 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 8280 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 8400: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8400”); the MF 8280 A: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8280”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources