John Deere 8320 T or Lamborghini 260 Victory?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8320 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 260 Victory has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Lamborghini 260 Victory suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for John Deere 8320 T and Lamborghini 260 Victory, with the call on each
Question8320 T260 VictoryCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?184 kW (247 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”191.2 kW (256.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8320 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 260 Victory has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8320 T and the 260 Victory.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8320 T and the 260 Victory.
Which pumps more oil for implements?131.0 L/min (34.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”120.3 L/min (31.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 8320 T: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”); the 260 Victory: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?12,127 kg (26,735 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”8,450 kg (18,629 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 8320 T is 44% heavier (3,677 kg / 8,106 lb) than the Lamborghini 260 Victory (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?14,288 kg (31,500 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”40Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”Sources disagreeNo call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the 8320 T.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8320 T.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”AheadThe Lamborghini 260 Victory has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 8320 T (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”Sources disagreeNo call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the 8320 T.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?TracksTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”; OECD test report 2043, 20034WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”DifferDrive differs: the John Deere 8320 T Tracks and the Lamborghini 260 Victory 4WD — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2002–20051999–2001EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The John Deere 8320 T is 44% heavier (3,677 kg / 8,106 lb) than the Lamborghini 260 Victory (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini 260 Victory has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 8320 T (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Drive differs: the John Deere 8320 T Tracks and the Lamborghini 260 Victory 4WD — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8320 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 260 Victory has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 8320 T: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”); the 260 Victory: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the 8320 T.
  • No call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the 8320 T.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources