John Deere 8320 or Renault Altes 936 RZ?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8320 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Altes 936 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The John Deere 8320 suits road haulage better on this data: 13% (1,650 kg / 3,638 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for John Deere 8320 and Renault Altes 936 RZ, with the call on each
Question8320Altes 936 RZCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?184 kW (247 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320”184 kW (247 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8320 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Altes 936 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8320 and the Altes 936 RZ.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8320 and the Altes 936 RZ.
Which pumps more oil for implements?——No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 8320 and the Altes 936 RZ.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—12,250 kg (27,007 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 8320.
Which is heavier, for traction?9,085 kg (20,029 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320”9,720 kg (21,429 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320”12,350 kg (27,227 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ”AheadThe John Deere 8320 has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (1,650 kg / 3,638 lb) than the Renault Altes 936 RZ (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320”18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8320 and the Altes 936 RZ.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320”; OECD test report 2045, 20034WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 936 RZ”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2002–20052001–2005EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The John Deere 8320 has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (1,650 kg / 3,638 lb) than the Renault Altes 936 RZ (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8320 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Altes 936 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources