John Deere 8310 vs Lamborghini 240 Traction

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1999–2002

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1993–1994

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 8310 and the 240 Traction → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

John Deere 8310 and Lamborghini 240 Traction, field by field
Field	8310	240 Traction	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	232 hp	240.7 hp	—
Engine declared	John Deere-PowerTech 6.081 HRW-15	Cummins 6 CTA 8.3 A	differs
Displacement declared	8.13 L	8.27 L	—
Maximum torque declared	741 lb·ft · 1,005 N·m	705 lb·ft · 956 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated hydraulic wet John Deere multi-plate clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	—	—
Pump flow declared	31.8 gpm · 120.4 L/min	20.5 gpm · 77.6 L/min	+55% 8310
Pressure declared	3,379 psi · 233 bar	2,756 psi · 190 bar	+23% 8310
Three-point lift at ends declared	11,645 lb · 5,282 kg	16,755 lb · 7,600 kg	+44% 240 Traction
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	19,864 lb · 9,010 kg	19,623 lb · 8,901 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	30,865 lb · 14,000 kg	26,455 lb · 12,000 kg	+17% 8310
Wheelbase declared	116.1 in · 2,950 mm	116.1 in · 2,950 mm	—
Length declared	216.0 in · 5,487 mm	194.0 in · 4,928 mm	+11% 8310
Width declared	118.6 in · 3,012 mm	96.1 in · 2,440 mm	+23% 8310
Height declared	121.1 in · 3,075 mm	123.8 in · 3,145 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	15.9 in · 405 mm	14.8 in · 376 mm	+8% 8310
Fuel tank declared	540.0 qt · 511.0 L	—	—

Source

Source