John Deere 8110 T or Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8110 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SAME Rubin 200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 8110T suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 53% (41.8 L/min / 11.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 8110 T | SAME Rubin 200 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 143.5 kW (192.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | 143.4 kW (192.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8110 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SAME Rubin 200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8110 T and the SAME Rubin 200. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8110 T and the SAME Rubin 200. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 120.4 L/min (31.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | 78.6 L/min (20.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200” | AheadThe John Deere 8110T has 53% more hydraulic flow (41.8 L/min / 11.0 gpm) than the Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,976 kg (10,971 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the SAME Rubin 200. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 10,727 kg (23,649 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | 7,200 kg (15,873 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 8110T is 49% heavier (3,527 kg / 7,776 lb) than the Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 14,288 kg (31,500 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the SAME Rubin 200. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | 18 to 27Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8110 T and the SAME Rubin 200. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200” | AheadThe Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 8110T (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200” | AheadThe Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 8110T does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | TracksTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 200” | DifferDrive differs: the John Deere 8110T Tracks and the Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200 4WD — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2000–2002 | 2000–2004 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 8110T has 53% more hydraulic flow (41.8 L/min / 11.0 gpm) than the Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 8110T is 49% heavier (3,527 kg / 7,776 lb) than the Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 8110T (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 8110T does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Drive differs: the John Deere 8110T Tracks and the Lamborghini SAME Rubin 200 4WD — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8110 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SAME Rubin 200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources