John Deere 7290R vs John Deere 8345 RT
7 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because their unladen weight differs by more than 25% (45%); the drive differs (4WD; Tracks); they were not built in overlapping years (2014–2014; 2009–2009); the 8345 RT is on tracks, not an alternative to an ordinary tractor. The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
7 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 7290R | 8345 RT | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 308 hp | 341 hp | +10% 8345 RT |
| Maximum torque declared | 963 lb·ft · 1,305 N·m | 1,117 lb·ft · 1,515 N·m | +16% 8345 RT |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic centre declared | Closed centre | Closed centre | — |
| Hydraulic control declared | — | Load sensing | — |
| Pump flow declared | 42.8 gpm · 162 L/min | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 23,845 lb · 10,816 kg | 34,613 lb · 15,700 kg | +45% 8345 RT |
| Wheelbase declared | 115.2 in · 2,925 mm | 99.0 in · 2,515 mm | +16% 7290R |
| Length declared | 207.8 in · 5,278 mm | 231.9 in · 5,890 mm | +12% 8345 RT |
| Width declared | 100.2 in · 2,544 mm | 115.0 in · 2,920 mm | +15% 8345 RT |
| Height declared | 130.4 in · 3,313 mm | 130.7 in · 3,320 mm | — |
| Fuel tank declared | — | 801.0 qt · 758 L | — |
John Deere 7290R sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7290 R”
- Source: OECD test report 2851, 2014
- Source: OECD test report 2847, 2014
John Deere 8345 RT sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8345 RT”
- Source: OECD test report 2591