John Deere 7290R vs John Deere 8295 R
4 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because the drive differs (4WD; Tracks); they were not built in overlapping years (2014–2014; 2009–2009); the 8295 R is on tracks, not an alternative to an ordinary tractor. The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
4 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 7290R | 8295 R | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 308 hp | 291 hp | +6% 7290R |
| Maximum torque declared | 963 lb·ft · 1,305 N·m | 966 lb·ft · 1,310 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h | 31.1 mph · 50 km/h | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic centre declared | Closed centre | Closed centre | — |
| Hydraulic control declared | — | Load sensing | — |
| Pump flow declared | 42.8 gpm · 162 L/min | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 23,845 lb · 10,816 kg | 27,448 lb · 12,450 kg | +15% 8295 R |
| Wheelbase declared | 115.2 in · 2,925 mm | 118.9 in · 3,020 mm | — |
| Length declared | 207.8 in · 5,278 mm | 220.1 in · 5,590 mm | +6% 8295 R |
| Width declared | 100.2 in · 2,544 mm | 97.6 in · 2,480 mm | — |
| Height declared | 130.4 in · 3,313 mm | 120.5 in · 3,060 mm | +8% 7290R |
| Fuel tank declared | — | 719.6 qt · 681 L | — |
John Deere 7290R sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7290 R”
- Source: OECD test report 2851, 2014
- Source: OECD test report 2847, 2014
John Deere 8295 R sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8295 R”
- Source: OECD test report 2616