John Deere 7220 or Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 7220 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R.1106 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 7220 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 72% (47.7 L/min / 12.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 7220 | R.1106 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 81 kW (109 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7220” | 80.9 kW (108.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7220 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R.1106 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 7220 and the R.1106 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 7220 and the R.1106 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 113.9 L/min (30.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7220” | 66.2 L/min (17.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)” | AheadThe John Deere 7220 has 72% more hydraulic flow (47.7 L/min / 12.6 gpm) than the Lamborghini R.1106 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,550 kg (5,622 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7220” | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 7220: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7220”); the R.1106 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,366 kg (11,830 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7220” | 4,340 kg (9,568 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 7220 is 24% heavier (1,026 kg / 2,262 lb) than the Lamborghini R.1106 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7220” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R.1106 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7220” | 20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 7220 and the R.1106 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7220” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7220” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 7220 and the R.1106 (DT). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7220”; OECD test report 2080, 2003 | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2003–2007 | 2004– | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 7220 has 72% more hydraulic flow (47.7 L/min / 12.6 gpm) than the Lamborghini R.1106 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 7220 is 24% heavier (1,026 kg / 2,262 lb) than the Lamborghini R.1106 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7220 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R.1106 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 7220: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7220”); the R.1106 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1106 (DT)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources