John Deere 6910 or New Holland TSA 135?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6910 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TSA 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 6910 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 31% (1,814 kg / 3,999 lb) more three-point lift.
- The John Deere 6910 suits road haulage better on this data: 15% (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 6910 | TSA 135 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6910” | 100 kW (134 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6910 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TSA 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6910 and the TSA 135. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6910 and the TSA 135. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 96.5 L/min (25.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 6910. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 7,699 kg (16,973 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6910” | 5,885 kg (12,974 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135” | AheadThe John Deere 6910 has 31% more lift (1,814 kg / 3,999 lb) than the New Holland TSA 135 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,125 kg (13,503 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6910” | 5,527 kg (12,185 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 6910 is 11% heavier (598 kg / 1,318 lb) than the New Holland TSA 135 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6910” | 8,700 kg (19,180 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135” | AheadThe John Deere 6910 has 15% higher maximum permissible mass (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) than the New Holland TSA 135 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6910” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135” | Sources disagreeNo call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the 6910. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6910 and the TSA 135. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6910” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6910” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6910” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6910”; OECD test report 1824, 1999; OECD test report 1883, 2000; Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6910S” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1997–2003 | 2003–2005 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TSA 135 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 6910 has 31% more lift (1,814 kg / 3,999 lb) than the New Holland TSA 135 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 6910 is 11% heavier (598 kg / 1,318 lb) than the New Holland TSA 135 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 6910 has 15% higher maximum permissible mass (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) than the New Holland TSA 135 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TSA 135 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6910 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TSA 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the 6910.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources