John Deere 5603 or Steyr 360 Kompakt?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the John Deere 5603: hydraulic flow. On features, the Steyr 360 Kompakt is ahead on forward gears.

  • The John Deere 5603 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 21% (11.1 L/min / 2.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for John Deere 5603 and Steyr 360 Kompakt, with the call on each
Question5603360 KompaktCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?36.0 kW (48.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5603”35.3 kW (47.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5603 and the 360 Kompakt.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5603 and the 360 Kompakt.
Which pumps more oil for implements?63.2 L/min (16.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5603”52.1 L/min (13.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt”AheadThe John Deere 5603 has 21% more hydraulic flow (11.1 L/min / 2.9 gpm) than the Steyr 360 Kompakt (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,120 kg (4,674 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5603”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 360 Kompakt.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,320 kg (7,319 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5603”2,850 kg (6,283 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 5603 is 16% heavier (470 kg / 1,036 lb) than the Steyr 360 Kompakt (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5603.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5603”16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt”AheadThe Steyr 360 Kompakt has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the John Deere 5603 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5603 and the 360 Kompakt.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5603”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540E/540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5603”430/540/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5603”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 360 Kompakt.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5603”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2007–2004–2008EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The John Deere 5603 has 21% more hydraulic flow (11.1 L/min / 2.9 gpm) than the Steyr 360 Kompakt (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The John Deere 5603 is 16% heavier (470 kg / 1,036 lb) than the Steyr 360 Kompakt (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr 360 Kompakt has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the John Deere 5603 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources