John Deere 3255 or Massey Ferguson MF 6170 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 3255 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6170 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The John Deere 3255 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 86% (43.5 L/min / 11.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for John Deere 3255 and Massey Ferguson MF 6170 (A), with the call on each
Question3255MF 6170 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?81.7 kW (109.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3255”81 kW (109 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 3255 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6170 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 3255 and the MF 6170 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 3255 and the MF 6170 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?93.9 L/min (24.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3255”50.4 L/min (13.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”AheadThe John Deere 3255 has 86% more hydraulic flow (43.5 L/min / 11.5 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson 6170 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,450 kg (9,811 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3255”3,717 kg (8,194 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 3255: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3255”); the MF 6170 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,320 kg (11,729 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3255”4,440 kg (9,789 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 3255 is 20% heavier (880 kg / 1,940 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 6170 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 3255.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3255”30 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 6170 (A) has 88% more forward gears (14 gears) than the John Deere 3255 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 3255 and the MF 6170 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3255”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3255”540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3255”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3255”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1991–19931995–1999EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The John Deere 3255 has 86% more hydraulic flow (43.5 L/min / 11.5 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson 6170 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The John Deere 3255 is 20% heavier (880 kg / 1,940 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 6170 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 6170 (A) has 88% more forward gears (14 gears) than the John Deere 3255 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 3255 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6170 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 3255: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3255”); the MF 6170 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources