John Deere 3055 vs Massey Ferguson MF 6260 (A)

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1992–1993

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1999–2003

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 3055 and the MF 6260 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

John Deere 3055 and Massey Ferguson MF 6260 (A), field by field
Field	3055	MF 6260 (A)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	103.7 hp	103.7 hp	—
Engine declared	John Deere 6.359 DL-011	Perkins 1006.60 NA	differs
Displacement declared	5.88 L	5.99 L	—
Maximum torque declared	285 lb·ft · 387 N·m	292 lb·ft · 396 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	+33% MF 6260 (A)
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated, dry LuK single-disc clutch	Pedal-operated hydraulic VALEO multi-plate clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Pump flow declared	24.2 gpm · 91.5 L/min	25.3 gpm · 95.7 L/min	—
Pressure declared	3,336 psi · 230 bar	3,336 psi · 230 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	14,330 lb · 6,500 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000/540E/1000E rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	9,524 lb · 4,320 kg	9,954 lb · 4,515 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	19,401 lb · 8,800 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	100.4 in · 2,551 mm	107.1 in · 2,720 mm	+7% MF 6260 (A)
Length declared	166.9 in · 4,240 mm	172.8 in · 4,390 mm	—
Width declared	89.0 in · 2,260 mm	82.0 in · 2,083 mm	+8% 3055
Height declared	107.7 in · 2,735 mm	114.2 in · 2,900 mm	+6% MF 6260 (A)
Ground clearance declared	17.3 in · 440 mm	20.1 in · 510 mm	+16% MF 6260 (A)
Turning radius, braked declared	13.2 ft · 4.01 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	127.9 qt · 121.0 L	237.8 qt · 225.0 L	+86% MF 6260 (A)

Source

Source