John Deere 2700 (A) or Renault Cergos 340?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 2700 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Cergos 340 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault Cergos 340 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 16% (7.6 L/min / 2.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The John Deere 2700 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 21% (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for John Deere 2700 (A) and Renault Cergos 340, with the call on each
Question2700 (A)Cergos 340Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?62.6 kW (83.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2700”62.6 kW (83.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Cergos 340”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2700 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Cergos 340 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 2700 (A) and the Cergos 340.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 2700 (A) and the Cergos 340.
Which pumps more oil for implements?46.7 L/min (12.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2700”54.3 L/min (14.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Cergos 340”AheadThe Renault Cergos 340 has 16% more hydraulic flow (7.6 L/min / 2.0 gpm) than the John Deere 2700 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,420 kg (9,744 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2700”4,570 kg (10,075 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Cergos 340”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,785 kg (8,344 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2700”4,255 kg (9,381 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Cergos 340”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Cergos 340 is 12% heavier (470 kg / 1,036 lb) than the John Deere 2700 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2700”6,200 kg (13,669 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Cergos 340”AheadThe John Deere 2700 (A) has 21% higher maximum permissible mass (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) than the Renault Cergos 340 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?18Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2700”18 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Cergos 340”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2700 (A) and the Cergos 340.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2700”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Cergos 340”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2700”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Cergos 340”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2700”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Cergos 340.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2700”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Cergos 340”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–19961996–2001EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault Cergos 340 has 16% more hydraulic flow (7.6 L/min / 2.0 gpm) than the John Deere 2700 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Cergos 340 is 12% heavier (470 kg / 1,036 lb) than the John Deere 2700 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The John Deere 2700 (A) has 21% higher maximum permissible mass (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) than the Renault Cergos 340 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2700 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Cergos 340 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources