John Deere 2300 (A) or WHITE 6065?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 2300 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6065 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 2300 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 79% (1,780 kg / 3,924 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 2300 (A) | 6065 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 51.5 kW (69.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | 51.5 kW (69.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6065” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2300 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6065 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 2300 (A) and the 6065. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 2300 (A) and the 6065. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 40.2 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 6065. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,030 kg (8,885 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | 2,250 kg (4,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 6065” | AheadThe John Deere 2300 (A) has 79% more lift (1,780 kg / 3,924 lb) than the WHITE 6065 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,260 kg (7,187 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | 2,860 kg (6,305 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 6065” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 2300 (A) is 14% heavier (400 kg / 882 lb) than the WHITE 6065 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,600 kg (12,346 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6065. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | 12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6065” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2300 (A) and the 6065. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 6065” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | 540/540E/1000E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 6065” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6065” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2300” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 6065” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–1996 | 1992–1999 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 2300 (A) has 79% more lift (1,780 kg / 3,924 lb) than the WHITE 6065 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2300 (A) is 14% heavier (400 kg / 882 lb) than the WHITE 6065 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2300 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6065 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources