John Deere 2200 (A) or Lamborghini 664-65 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 2200 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 664-65 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 2200 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 14% (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 27% (790 kg / 1,742 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Lamborghini 664-65 (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 2200 (A) | 664-65 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 46.4 kW (62.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | 46.3 kW (62.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Sprint 664-65 (DT)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2200 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 664-65 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 2200 (A) and the 664-65 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 2200 (A) and the 664-65 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 41.0 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | 36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Sprint 664-65 (DT)” | AheadThe John Deere 2200 (A) has 14% more hydraulic flow (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Lamborghini 664-65 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,690 kg (8,135 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | 2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Sprint 664-65 (DT)” | AheadThe John Deere 2200 (A) has 27% more lift (790 kg / 1,742 lb) than the Lamborghini 664-65 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,165 kg (6,978 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | 2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Sprint 664-65 (DT)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 2200 (A) is 22% heavier (565 kg / 1,246 lb) than the Lamborghini 664-65 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,500 kg (12,125 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | 5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Sprint 664-65 (DT)” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | 16 to 30Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Sprint 664-65 (DT)” | AheadThe Lamborghini 664-65 (DT) has 60% more forward gears (6 gears) than the John Deere 2200 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2200 (A) and the 664-65 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Sprint 664-65 (DT)” | AheadThe Lamborghini 664-65 (DT) has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 2200 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Sprint 664-65 (DT)” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Sprint 664-65 (DT)” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Sprint 664-65 (DT)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–1996 | 1999–2004 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini 664-65 (DT) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 2200 (A) has 14% more hydraulic flow (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Lamborghini 664-65 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2200 (A) has 27% more lift (790 kg / 1,742 lb) than the Lamborghini 664-65 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2200 (A) is 22% heavier (565 kg / 1,246 lb) than the Lamborghini 664-65 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini 664-65 (DT) has 60% more forward gears (6 gears) than the John Deere 2200 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini 664-65 (DT) has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 2200 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini 664-65 (DT) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2200 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 664-65 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources