John Deere 2140 (A) or Renault 96?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 2140 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 96 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 2140 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 50% (15.7 L/min / 4.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 45% (1,130 kg / 2,491 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 2140 (A) | 96 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 60.4 kW (81.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2140” | 60.4 kW (81.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2140 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 96 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 2140 (A) and the 96. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 2140 (A) and the 96. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 47.0 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2140” | 31.3 L/min (8.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | AheadThe John Deere 2140 (A) has 50% more hydraulic flow (15.7 L/min / 4.1 gpm) than the Renault 96 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,630 kg (8,003 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2140” | 2,500 kg (5,512 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | AheadThe John Deere 2140 (A) has 45% more lift (1,130 kg / 2,491 lb) than the Renault 96 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,050 kg (6,724 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2140” | 3,430 kg (7,562 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 96 is 12% heavier (380 kg / 838 lb) than the John Deere 2140 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2140” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 96. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2140” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2140 (A) and the 96. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2140” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2140” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | AheadThe Renault 96 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 2140 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2140” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2140” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | AheadThe John Deere 2140 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 96 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1979–1986 | 1969–1972 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 2140 (A) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 2140 (A) has 50% more hydraulic flow (15.7 L/min / 4.1 gpm) than the Renault 96 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2140 (A) has 45% more lift (1,130 kg / 2,491 lb) than the Renault 96 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 96 is 12% heavier (380 kg / 838 lb) than the John Deere 2140 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 96 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 2140 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The John Deere 2140 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 96 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The John Deere 2140 (A) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2140 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 96 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources