John Deere 2120 (A) or Massey Ferguson MF 274 S (A)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Massey Ferguson 274 S (A) is ahead on PTO speeds.
- The Massey Ferguson 274 S (A) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 2120 (A) | MF 274 S (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 42.5 kW (57.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2120” | 42.9 kW (57.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 274 (S)” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 2120 (A) and the MF 274 S (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 2120 (A) and the MF 274 S (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 28.6 L/min (7.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2120” | 29.0 L/min (7.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 274 (S)” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,040 kg (4,497 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2120” | 1,960 kg (4,321 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 274 (S)” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,887 kg (6,365 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2120” | 2,860 kg (6,305 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 274 (S)” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2120” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 274 S (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2120” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 274 (S)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2120 (A) and the MF 274 S (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2120” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 274 (S)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2120” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 274 (S)” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 274 S (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 2120 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2120” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 274 (S)” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2120” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 274 (S)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1968–1972 | 1982–1987 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 274 S (A) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson 274 S (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 2120 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Massey Ferguson 274 S (A) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources