John Deere 1140 (A) or VALMET 4300?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the John Deere 1140 (A) is ahead on hydraulic flow; the VALMET 4300 is ahead on three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for John Deere 1140 (A) and VALMET 4300, with the call on each
Question1140 (A)4300Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?37.0 kW (49.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”37.0 kW (49.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4300”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1140 (A) and the 4300.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1140 (A) and the 4300.
Which pumps more oil for implements?47.0 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”39.0 L/min (10.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4300”AheadThe John Deere 1140 (A) has 21% more hydraulic flow (8.0 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the VALMET 4300 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”2,855 kg (6,294 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4300”AheadThe VALMET 4300 has 19% more lift (455 kg / 1,003 lb) than the John Deere 1140 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,535 kg (5,589 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”2,790 kg (6,151 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4300”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 4300 is 10% heavier (255 kg / 562 lb) than the John Deere 1140 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 4300.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4300”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1140 (A) and the 4300.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4300”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”540E/540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4300”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4300”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4300”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1979–19861993–1996Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 4300 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The John Deere 1140 (A) has 21% more hydraulic flow (8.0 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the VALMET 4300 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 4300 has 19% more lift (455 kg / 1,003 lb) than the John Deere 1140 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 4300 is 10% heavier (255 kg / 562 lb) than the John Deere 1140 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 4300 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources