John Deere 1140 (A) or SAME Explorer 60 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the SAME Explorer 60 (DT) is ahead on PTO speeds.

  • The SAME Explorer 60 (DT) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for John Deere 1140 (A) and SAME Explorer 60 (DT), with the call on each
Question1140 (A)Explorer 60 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?37.0 kW (49.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”36.6 kW (49.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 60”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1140 (A) and the Explorer 60 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1140 (A) and the Explorer 60 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?47.0 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Explorer 60 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”2,270 kg (5,004 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 60”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,535 kg (5,589 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”2,540 kg (5,600 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 60”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Explorer 60 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 60”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1140 (A) and the Explorer 60 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 60”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 60”AheadThe SAME Explorer 60 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 1140 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 60”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1140”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 60”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1979–19861986–1990Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SAME Explorer 60 (DT) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The SAME Explorer 60 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 1140 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The SAME Explorer 60 (DT) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources