John Deere 1020 OU or SAME Atlanta 45 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 1020 OU has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Atlanta 45 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 1020 OU suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 108% (13.0 L/min / 3.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1020 OU | Atlanta 45 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 32.4 kW (43.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1020 OU” | 32.4 kW (43.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Atlanta 45 (DT)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1020 OU has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Atlanta 45 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1020 OU and the Atlanta 45 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1020 OU and the Atlanta 45 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 25.0 L/min (6.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1020 OU” | 12.0 L/min (3.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Atlanta 45 (DT)” | AheadThe John Deere 1020 OU has 108% more hydraulic flow (13.0 L/min / 3.4 gpm) than the SAME Atlanta 45 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,620 kg (3,571 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1020 OU” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Atlanta 45 (DT). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,026 kg (4,467 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1020 OU” | 1,640 kg (3,616 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Atlanta 45 (DT)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 1020 OU is 24% heavier (386 kg / 851 lb) than the SAME Atlanta 45 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1020 OU” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Atlanta 45 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1020 OU” | 6 to 9Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Atlanta 45 (DT)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1020 OU and the Atlanta 45 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1020 OU” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Atlanta 45 (DT)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1020 OU” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Atlanta 45 (DT)” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1020 OU” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Atlanta 45 (DT)” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1020 OU” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Atlanta 45 (DT)” | AheadThe SAME Atlanta 45 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the John Deere 1020 OU is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1967–1972 | 1966–1970 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 1020 OU has 108% more hydraulic flow (13.0 L/min / 3.4 gpm) than the SAME Atlanta 45 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 1020 OU is 24% heavier (386 kg / 851 lb) than the SAME Atlanta 45 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The SAME Atlanta 45 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the John Deere 1020 OU is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1020 OU has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Atlanta 45 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources