J.I. Case Modell-LA or Lanz D 2539?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Modell-LA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 2539 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Lanz D 2539 suits road haulage better on this data: 105% (16.8 km/h / 10.4 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Modell-LA | D 2539 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 39.1 kW (52.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case LA” | 40.3 kW (54.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 2539” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Modell-LA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 2539 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Modell-LA and the D 2539. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Modell-LA and the D 2539. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Modell-LA and the D 2539. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Modell-LA and the D 2539. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,457 kg (7,621 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case LA” | 4,540 kg (10,009 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 2539” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lanz D 2539 is 31% heavier (1,083 kg / 2,388 lb) than the J.I. Case Modell-LA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Modell-LA and the D 2539. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 4Traktorenlexikon, “Case LA” | 5Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 2539” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Modell-LA and the D 2539. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 16.0 km/h (9.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case LA” | 32.8 km/h (20.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 2539” | AheadThe Lanz D 2539 has 105% more top speed (16.8 km/h / 10.4 mph) than the J.I. Case Modell-LA (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case LA” | 750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 2539” | DifferPTO speeds differ: the J.I. Case Modell-LA 540 rpm and the Lanz D 2539 750 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Modell-LA and the D 2539. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case LA” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 2539” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1940–1952 | 1937–1954 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lanz D 2539 is 31% heavier (1,083 kg / 2,388 lb) than the J.I. Case Modell-LA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Lanz D 2539 has 105% more top speed (16.8 km/h / 10.4 mph) than the J.I. Case Modell-LA (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- PTO speeds differ: the J.I. Case Modell-LA 540 rpm and the Lanz D 2539 750 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Modell-LA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 2539 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources