J.I. Case 941 GP or Renault 96?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 941 GP has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 96 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The J.I. Case 941 GP suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 88% (27.4 L/min / 7.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for J.I. Case 941 GP and Renault 96, with the call on each
Question941 GP96Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?61.9 kW (83.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 941”60.4 kW (81.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 941 GP has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 96 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 941 GP and the 96.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 941 GP and the 96.
Which pumps more oil for implements?58.7 L/min (15.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 941”31.3 L/min (8.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631”AheadThe J.I. Case 941 GP has 88% more hydraulic flow (27.4 L/min / 7.2 gpm) than the Renault 96 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,500 kg (5,512 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 941 GP.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,994 kg (8,805 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 941”3,430 kg (7,562 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 941 GP is 16% heavier (564 kg / 1,243 lb) than the Renault 96 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 941 GP and the 96.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6 to 8Traktorenlexikon, “Case 941”8Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 941 GP and the 96.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 941”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 941”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 941 GP.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 941”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1959–19691969–1972Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 96 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The J.I. Case 941 GP has 88% more hydraulic flow (27.4 L/min / 7.2 gpm) than the Renault 96 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The J.I. Case 941 GP is 16% heavier (564 kg / 1,243 lb) than the Renault 96 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 96 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 941 GP has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 96 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources