J.I. Case 870 or Lamborghini R-754 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 870 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-754 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for J.I. Case 870 and Lamborghini R-754 (DT), with the call on each
Question870R-754 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?52.7 kW (70.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 870”53 kW (71 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 754 DT”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 870 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-754 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 870 and the R-754 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 870 and the R-754 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?60.6 L/min (16.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 870”—No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the R-754 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—3,800 kg (8,378 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 754 DT”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 870.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,175 kg (9,204 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 870”3,060 kg (6,746 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 754 DT”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 870 is 36% heavier (1,115 kg / 2,458 lb) than the Lamborghini R-754 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 870 and the R-754 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 870”12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 754 DT”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 870 and the R-754 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 870”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 754 DT”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 870”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 754 DT”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 870”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the R-754 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 870”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 754 DT”AheadThe Lamborghini R-754 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 870 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1969–19731975–1985Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini R-754 (DT) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The J.I. Case 870 is 36% heavier (1,115 kg / 2,458 lb) than the Lamborghini R-754 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini R-754 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 870 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Lamborghini R-754 (DT) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 870 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-754 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources