J.I. Case 2594 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 2775?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 2594 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 2775 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Massey Ferguson 2775 suits road haulage better on this data: 18% (5.5 km/h / 3.4 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 2594 (DT) | MF 2775 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 139.7 kW (187.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2594” | 139.7 kW (187.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2594 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 2775 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 2594 (DT) and the MF 2775. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 2594 (DT) and the MF 2775. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 55.0 L/min (14.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2594 (DT). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,100 kg (13,448 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2594” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the MF 2775. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,430 kg (16,380 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2594” | 6,038 kg (13,312 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 2594 (DT) is 23% heavier (1,392 kg / 3,069 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 2775 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 2594 (DT) and the MF 2775. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2594” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | AheadThe J.I. Case 2594 (DT) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 2775 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2594 (DT) and the MF 2775. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2594” | 35.5 km/h (22.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 2775 has 18% more top speed (5.5 km/h / 3.4 mph) than the J.I. Case 2594 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2594” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2594” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 2775. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2594” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1984–1985 | 1977–1983 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 2594 (DT) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The J.I. Case 2594 (DT) is 23% heavier (1,392 kg / 3,069 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 2775 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 2594 (DT) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 2775 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 2775 has 18% more top speed (5.5 km/h / 3.4 mph) than the J.I. Case 2594 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 2594 (DT) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2594 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 2775 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources