J.I. Case 2390 or Renault 180-94 TZ?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 2390 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 180-94 TZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault 180-94 TZ suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 81% (4,920 kg / 10,847 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Renault 180-94 TZ suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 2390 | 180-94 TZ | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 125.8 kW (168.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2390” | 125.1 kW (167.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2390 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 180-94 TZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 2390 and the 180-94 TZ. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 2390 and the 180-94 TZ. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 59.9 L/min (15.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2390. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,100 kg (13,448 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2390” | 11,020 kg (24,295 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862” | AheadThe Renault 180-94 TZ has 81% more lift (4,920 kg / 10,847 lb) than the J.I. Case 2390 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,072 kg (15,591 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2390” | 6,237 kg (13,750 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 2390 is 13% heavier (835 kg / 1,841 lb) than the Renault 180-94 TZ (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 9,750 kg (21,495 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 2390. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2390” | 27Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862” | AheadThe Renault 180-94 TZ has 125% more forward gears (15 gears) than the J.I. Case 2390 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2390 and the 180-94 TZ. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2390” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862” | AheadThe Renault 180-94 TZ has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the J.I. Case 2390 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2390” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862” | AheadThe Renault 180-94 TZ offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the J.I. Case 2390 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2390” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2390” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862” | AheadThe Renault 180-94 TZ is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 2390 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1978–1983 | 1991–1997 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 180-94 TZ is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault 180-94 TZ has 81% more lift (4,920 kg / 10,847 lb) than the J.I. Case 2390 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 2390 is 13% heavier (835 kg / 1,841 lb) than the Renault 180-94 TZ (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 180-94 TZ has 125% more forward gears (15 gears) than the J.I. Case 2390 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 180-94 TZ has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the J.I. Case 2390 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 180-94 TZ offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the J.I. Case 2390 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Renault 180-94 TZ is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 2390 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Renault 180-94 TZ is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2390 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 180-94 TZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources