J.I. Case 2294 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 3645 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 2294 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3645 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Massey Ferguson 3645 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 40% (1,805 kg / 3,979 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 2294 (DT) | MF 3645 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 103.7 kW (139.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2294” | 104.5 kW (140.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3645” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2294 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3645 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 2294 (DT) and the MF 3645 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 2294 (DT) and the MF 3645 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2294 (DT) and the MF 3645 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,535 kg (9,998 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2294” | 6,340 kg (13,977 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3645” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 3645 (A) has 40% more lift (1,805 kg / 3,979 lb) than the J.I. Case 2294 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,527 kg (14,390 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2294” | 5,180 kg (11,420 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3645” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 2294 (DT) is 26% heavier (1,347 kg / 2,970 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 3645 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 2294 (DT) and the MF 3645 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2294” | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3645” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 3645 (A) has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the J.I. Case 2294 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2294 (DT) and the MF 3645 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2294” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3645” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2294” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3645” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2294” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3645” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2294” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3645” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 3645 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 2294 (DT) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1984–1985 | 1990–1995 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 3645 (A) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson 3645 (A) has 40% more lift (1,805 kg / 3,979 lb) than the J.I. Case 2294 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 2294 (DT) is 26% heavier (1,347 kg / 2,970 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 3645 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 3645 (A) has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the J.I. Case 2294 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 3645 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 2294 (DT) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Massey Ferguson 3645 (A) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2294 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3645 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources