J.I. Case 2090 vs SAME Buffalo 130 (DT)

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1978–1983

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1978–1982

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 2090 and the Buffalo 130 (DT) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

J.I. Case 2090 and SAME Buffalo 130 (DT), field by field
Field	2090	Buffalo 130 (DT)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	118.4 hp	122.3 hp	—
Engine declared	CASE 504 BD	SAME DA 1056 P	differs
Displacement declared	8.26 L	6.23 L	+33% 2090
Maximum torque declared	318 lb·ft · 431 N·m	295 lb·ft · 400 N·m	+8% 2090
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5–18.6 mph · 25–30 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated wet disc clutch	Pedal operated dry BORG & BECK single plate clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	21.0 gpm · 79.5 L/min	9.2 gpm · 35.0 L/min	+127% 2090
Three-point lift at ends declared	9,921 lb · 4,500 kg	10,071 lb · 4,568 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	11,909–12,031 lb · 5,402–5,457 kg	9,480 lb · 4,300 kg	differs
Wheelbase declared	104.0 in · 2,642 mm	104.7 in · 2,660 mm	—
Length declared	161.8 in · 4,110 mm	170.1 in · 4,320 mm	—
Width declared	79.1 in · 2,010 mm	85.4 in · 2,170 mm	+8% Buffalo 130 (DT)
Height declared	115.0 in · 2,921 mm	111.4 in · 2,830 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	21.0 in · 533 mm	20.9 in · 530 mm	—
Turning radius, braked declared	11.8 ft · 3.61 m	13.5 ft · 4.10 m	+14% Buffalo 130 (DT)
Fuel tank declared	259.9 qt · 246.0 L	147.9 qt · 140.0 L	+76% 2090

Source

Source