J.I. Case 2090 or John Deere 7400 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 2090 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7400 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 7400 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 23% (18.5 L/min / 4.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The John Deere 7400 (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 2090 | 7400 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2090” | 88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7400” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2090 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7400 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 2090 and the 7400 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 2090 and the 7400 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 79.5 L/min (21.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2090” | 98.0 L/min (25.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7400” | AheadThe John Deere 7400 (A) has 23% more hydraulic flow (18.5 L/min / 4.9 gpm) than the J.I. Case 2090 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2090” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 7400 (A). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,402 kg (11,909 lb) to 5,457 kg (12,031 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2090” | 5,744 kg (12,663 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7400” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7400” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 2090. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2090” | 12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7400” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2090 and the 7400 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2090” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7400” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2090” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7400” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2090” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7400” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2090” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7400” | AheadThe John Deere 7400 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 2090 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1978–1983 | 1993–1997 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 7400 (A) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 7400 (A) has 23% more hydraulic flow (18.5 L/min / 4.9 gpm) than the J.I. Case 2090 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 7400 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 2090 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The John Deere 7400 (A) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2090 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7400 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources