J.I. Case 1594 (DT) or URSUS 1.002 / 1.004?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 1594 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1.002 / 1.004 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 24% (826 kg / 1,821 lb) more three-point lift.
- The J.I. Case 1594 (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1594 (DT) | 1.002 / 1.004 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 71.3 kW (95.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1594” | 70.6 kW (94.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1594 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1.002 / 1.004 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1594 (DT) and the 1.002 / 1.004. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1594 (DT) and the 1.002 / 1.004. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1594 (DT) and the 1.002 / 1.004. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,375 kg (7,441 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1594” | 4,201 kg (9,262 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004” | AheadThe URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 has 24% more lift (826 kg / 1,821 lb) than the J.I. Case 1594 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,239 kg (9,345 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1594” | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 1594 (DT) is 21% heavier (739 kg / 1,629 lb) than the URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1594 (DT) and the 1.002 / 1.004. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1594” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004” | AheadThe URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the J.I. Case 1594 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1594 (DT) and the 1.002 / 1.004. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1594” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004” | AheadThe J.I. Case 1594 (DT) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1594” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1594 (DT) and the 1.002 / 1.004. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1594” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1984–1985 | 1984–2009 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 has 24% more lift (826 kg / 1,821 lb) than the J.I. Case 1594 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 1594 (DT) is 21% heavier (739 kg / 1,629 lb) than the URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the J.I. Case 1594 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 1594 (DT) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1594 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1.002 / 1.004 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources