J.I. Case 1494 (DT) or VALMET 4400?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the VALMET 4400: three-point lift. On features, the J.I. Case 1494 (DT) is ahead on PTO speeds.

  • The J.I. Case 1494 (DT) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
  • The VALMET 4400 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 17% (420 kg / 926 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for J.I. Case 1494 (DT) and VALMET 4400, with the call on each
Question1494 (DT)4400Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?41.1 kW (55.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”41.0 kW (55.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1494 (DT) and the 4400.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1494 (DT) and the 4400.
Which pumps more oil for implements?39.0 L/min (10.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1494 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,435 kg (5,368 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”2,855 kg (6,294 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”AheadThe VALMET 4400 has 17% more lift (420 kg / 926 lb) than the J.I. Case 1494 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,345 kg (7,374 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”2,790 kg (6,151 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 1494 (DT) is 20% heavier (555 kg / 1,224 lb) than the VALMET 4400 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1494 (DT) and the 4400.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1494 (DT) and the 4400.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”540E/540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”AheadThe J.I. Case 1494 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 4400 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4400”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19851993–1996Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 4400 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VALMET 4400 has 17% more lift (420 kg / 926 lb) than the J.I. Case 1494 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The J.I. Case 1494 (DT) is 20% heavier (555 kg / 1,224 lb) than the VALMET 4400 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The J.I. Case 1494 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 4400 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The VALMET 4400 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources