J.I. Case 1494 (DT) or Landini R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the J.I. Case 1494 (DT): three-point lift.

  • The J.I. Case 1494 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 30% (568 kg / 1,252 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for J.I. Case 1494 (DT) and Landini R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K), with the call on each
Question1494 (DT)R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?41.1 kW (55.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”41.2 kW (55.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1494 (DT) and the R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1494 (DT) and the R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K).
Which pumps more oil for implements?38.4 L/min (10.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1494 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,435 kg (5,368 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”1,867 kg (4,116 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860”AheadThe J.I. Case 1494 (DT) has 30% more lift (568 kg / 1,252 lb) than the Landini R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,345 kg (7,374 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”2,490 kg (5,490 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 1494 (DT) is 34% heavier (855 kg / 1,885 lb) than the Landini R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1494 (DT) and the R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1494 (DT) and the R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19851988–2000EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The J.I. Case 1494 (DT) has 30% more lift (568 kg / 1,252 lb) than the Landini R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The J.I. Case 1494 (DT) is 34% heavier (855 kg / 1,885 lb) than the Landini R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources