J.I. Case 1294 (DT) or VALMET 455/445-4?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the VALMET 455/445-4: hydraulic flow.

  • The VALMET 455/445-4 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 16% (4.3 L/min / 1.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for J.I. Case 1294 (DT) and VALMET 455/445-4, with the call on each
Question1294 (DT)455/445-4Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?41.2 kW (55.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”41.4 kW (55.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1294 (DT) and the 455/445-4.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1294 (DT) and the 455/445-4.
Which pumps more oil for implements?27.3 L/min (7.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”31.6 L/min (8.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”AheadThe VALMET 455/445-4 has 16% more hydraulic flow (4.3 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the J.I. Case 1294 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,345 kg (2,965 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”2,640 kg (5,820 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 1294 (DT): lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”); the 455/445-4: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,865 kg (6,316 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”2,720 kg (5,997 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1294 (DT) and the 455/445-4.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1294 (DT) and the 455/445-4.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1294 (DT) and the 455/445-4.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19851989–1994Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 455/445-4 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VALMET 455/445-4 has 16% more hydraulic flow (4.3 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the J.I. Case 1294 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 455/445-4 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 1294 (DT): lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”); the 455/445-4: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources