J.I. Case 12-25 vs J.I. Case 15-27
6 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because their unladen weight differs by more than 25% (42%); they were not built in overlapping years (1913–1918; 1919–1924). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
6 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 12-25 | 15-27 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 24.9 hp | 27.1 hp | +9% 15-27 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 2.2 mph · 3.54 km/h | 3.0 mph · 4.83 km/h | +36% 15-27 |
| Clutch declared | Hand lever-operated expanding shoe clutch, mounted in the flywheel | Hand lever-operated twin-disc clutch | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 8,995 lb · 4,080 kg | 6,349 lb · 2,880 kg | +42% 12-25 |
| Wheelbase declared | 90.0 in · 2,286 mm | 76.5 in · 1,943 mm | +18% 12-25 |
| Length declared | 149.0 in · 3,785 mm | 127.0 in · 3,226 mm | +17% 12-25 |
| Width declared | 73.0 in · 1,854 mm | 72.0 in · 1,829 mm | — |
| Height declared | 76.0 in · 1,930 mm | 68.0 in · 1,727 mm | +12% 12-25 |
J.I. Case 12-25 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case 12-25”
J.I. Case 15-27 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case 15-27”