J.I. Case 1194 vs Massey Ferguson MF 139 (A)

13 material differences

Tractor one

1984–1985

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1974–1979

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 1194 and the MF 139 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

13 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

J.I. Case 1194 and Massey Ferguson MF 139 (A), field by field
Field	1194	MF 139 (A)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	47.3 hp	41.4 hp	+14% 1194
Engine declared	DAVID BROWN AD 3/55	Eicher EDK 3-4	differs
Displacement declared	2.70 L	2.94 L	+9% MF 139 (A)
Maximum torque declared	123 lb·ft · 167 N·m	114 lb·ft · 155 N·m	+8% 1194
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	+20% 1194
Clutch declared	Dry double clutch	Pedal operated dry double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	7.0 gpm · 26.5 L/min	7.9 gpm · 30.0 L/min	+13% MF 139 (A)
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	3,307 lb · 1,500 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	4,652 lb · 2,110 kg	3,428 lb · 1,555 kg	+36% 1194
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	5,512 lb · 2,500 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	77.5 in · 1,969 mm	77.0 in · 1,955 mm	—
Length declared	121.0 in · 3,073 mm	124.0 in · 3,150 mm	—
Width declared	70.0 in · 1,778 mm	37.4 in · 950 mm	+87% 1194
Height declared	94.0 in · 2,388 mm	48.4 in · 1,230 mm	+94% 1194
Ground clearance declared	16.0 in · 406 mm	11.0 in · 280 mm	+45% 1194
Turning radius, braked declared	9.4 ft · 2.88 m	8.5 ft · 2.60 m	+11% 1194
Fuel tank declared	105.7 qt · 100.0 L	60.2 qt · 57.0 L	+75% 1194

Source

Source