J.I. Case 1190 vs Massey Ferguson MF 139 (A)

12 material differences

Tractor one

1980–1983

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1974–1979

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 1190 and the MF 139 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

12 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

J.I. Case 1190 and Massey Ferguson MF 139 (A), field by field
Field	1190	MF 139 (A)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	47.3 hp	41.4 hp	+14% 1190
Engine declared	DAVID BROWN AD 3/55	Eicher EDK 3-4	differs
Displacement declared	2.70 L	2.94 L	+9% MF 139 (A)
Maximum torque declared	116 lb·ft · 157 N·m	114 lb·ft · 155 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	+20% 1190
Clutch declared	Dry Laycock double clutch	Pedal operated dry double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	7.8 gpm · 29.4 L/min	7.9 gpm · 30.0 L/min	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	3,148 lb · 1,428 kg	3,307 lb · 1,500 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	4,621 lb · 2,096 kg	3,428 lb · 1,555 kg	+35% 1190
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	5,512 lb · 2,500 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	77.0 in · 1,956 mm	77.0 in · 1,955 mm	—
Length declared	130.7 in · 3,320 mm	124.0 in · 3,150 mm	+5% 1190
Width declared	75.2 in · 1,910 mm	37.4 in · 950 mm	+101% 1190
Height declared	94.1 in · 2,390 mm	48.4 in · 1,230 mm	+94% 1190
Ground clearance declared	13.4 in · 340 mm	11.0 in · 280 mm	+21% 1190
Turning radius, braked declared	9.5 ft · 2.90 m	8.5 ft · 2.60 m	+12% 1190
Fuel tank declared	63.4 qt · 60.0 L	60.2 qt · 57.0 L	+5% 1190

Source

Source