J.I. Case 1170 or J.I. Case 1200?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the J.I. Case 1200: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on drive. On features, the J.I. Case 1170 is ahead on forward gears, top speed and PTO speeds.
- The J.I. Case 1170 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 540 rpm.
- The J.I. Case 1200 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 50% (30.2 L/min / 8.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The J.I. Case 1200 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 22% (1,381 kg / 3,045 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
- The J.I. Case 1170 suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1170 | 1200 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 88.1 kW (118.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1170” | 88.2 kW (118.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1200 Traction King” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1170 and the 1200. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1170 and the 1200. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 60.6 L/min (16.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1170” | 90.8 L/min (24.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1200 Traction King” | AheadThe J.I. Case 1200 has 50% more hydraulic flow (30.2 L/min / 8.0 gpm) than the J.I. Case 1170 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 1170 and the 1200. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,142 kg (13,541 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1170” | 7,523 kg (16,585 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1200 Traction King” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 1200 is 22% heavier (1,381 kg / 3,045 lb) than the J.I. Case 1170 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1170 and the 1200. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1170” | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1200 Traction King” | AheadThe J.I. Case 1170 has 33% more forward gears (2 gears) than the J.I. Case 1200 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1170 and the 1200. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1170” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1200 Traction King” | AheadThe J.I. Case 1170 has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the J.I. Case 1200 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1170” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1200 Traction King” | AheadThe J.I. Case 1170 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the J.I. Case 1200 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1170” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1200. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1170” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1200 Traction King” | AheadThe J.I. Case 1200 is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 1170 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1970–1972 | 1964–1968 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 1170 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The J.I. Case 1200 has 50% more hydraulic flow (30.2 L/min / 8.0 gpm) than the J.I. Case 1170 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 1200 is 22% heavier (1,381 kg / 3,045 lb) than the J.I. Case 1170 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 1170 has 33% more forward gears (2 gears) than the J.I. Case 1200 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 1170 has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the J.I. Case 1200 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 1170 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the J.I. Case 1200 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The J.I. Case 1200 is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 1170 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The J.I. Case 1170 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources