International Harvester CUB LO-BOY vs John Deere Model-LA
7 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because their unladen weight differs by more than 25% (56%); they were not built in overlapping years (1955–1968; 1940–1946). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
7 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | CUB LO-BOY | Model-LA | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 13.3 hp | 14.3 hp | +8% Model-LA |
| Engine declared | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER C-60 | — | — |
| Displacement declared | 0.98 L | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 7.5 mph · 12 km/h | 9.3 mph · 15 km/h | +25% Model-LA |
| Clutch declared | Pedal operated dry ROCKFORD single plate clutch | Pedal operated dry single plate Thelander clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 2.8 gpm · 10.6 L/min | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 1800 rpm | 546 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 1,618 lb · 734 kg | 2,524 lb · 1,145 kg | +56% Model-LA |
| Wheelbase declared | 61.9 in · 1,572 mm | — | — |
| Length declared | 92.0 in · 2,337 mm | 93.0 in · 2,362 mm | — |
| Width declared | 48.3 in · 1,226 mm | 47.0 in · 1,194 mm | — |
| Height declared | 56.3 in · 1,429 mm | 60.0 in · 1,524 mm | +7% Model-LA |
| Ground clearance declared | 14.0 in · 356 mm | 20.2 in · 512 mm | +44% Model-LA |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 8.0 ft · 2.44 m | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 30.0 qt · 28.4 L | 32.0 qt · 30.3 L | +7% Model-LA |
International Harvester CUB LO-BOY sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Cub Lo-Boy”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick Farmall Cub”
John Deere Model-LA sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell-LA”