International Harvester CUB LO-BOY vs J. Bautz AG B 14 AS

8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1955–1968

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1949–1951

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the CUB LO-BOY and the B 14 AS → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

8 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

International Harvester CUB LO-BOY and J. Bautz AG B 14 AS, field by field
Field	CUB LO-BOY	B 14 AS	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	13.3 hp	14.1 hp	+6% B 14 AS
Engine declared	INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER C-60	Zanker M1	differs
Displacement declared	0.98 L	1.02 L	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	7.5 mph · 12 km/h	11.2 mph · 18 km/h	+50% B 14 AS
Clutch declared	Pedal operated dry ROCKFORD single plate clutch	Single plate dry clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	2.8 gpm · 10.6 L/min	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	1800 rpm	540 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	1,618 lb · 734 kg	2,535 lb · 1,150 kg	+57% B 14 AS
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	3,748 lb · 1,700 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	61.9 in · 1,572 mm	56.9 in · 1,445 mm	+9% CUB LO-BOY
Length declared	92.0 in · 2,337 mm	92.9 in · 2,360 mm	—
Width declared	48.3 in · 1,226 mm	59.8 in · 1,520 mm	+24% B 14 AS
Height declared	56.3 in · 1,429 mm	58.3 in · 1,480 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	14.0 in · 356 mm	11.8 in · 300 mm	+19% CUB LO-BOY
Turning radius, braked declared	8.0 ft · 2.44 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	30.0 qt · 28.4 L	—	—

Source

Source