International Harvester B-450 or Nuffield Universal-4 (4 DM)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the B-450 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Universal-4 (4 DM) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Nuffield Universal-4 (4 DM) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 101% (13.7 L/min / 3.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for International Harvester B-450 and Nuffield Universal-4 (4 DM), with the call on each
QuestionB-450Universal-4 (4 DM)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC B-450”40.2 kW (53.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 4 (1954-1961)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the B-450 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Universal-4 (4 DM) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the B-450 and the Universal-4 (4 DM).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the B-450 and the Universal-4 (4 DM).
Which pumps more oil for implements?13.6 L/min (3.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-450”27.3 L/min (7.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 4 (1954-1961)”AheadThe Nuffield Universal-4 (4 DM) has 101% more hydraulic flow (13.7 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the International Harvester B-450 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,830 kg (6,239 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC B-450”1,284 kg (2,831 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 4 (1954-1961)”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the B-450: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IHC B-450”); the Universal-4 (4 DM): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 4 (1954-1961)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,650 kg (5,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC B-450”2,243 kg (4,945 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 4 (1954-1961)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester B-450 is 18% heavier (407 kg / 897 lb) than the Nuffield Universal-4 (4 DM) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the B-450 and the Universal-4 (4 DM).
Which has the wider choice of gears?5 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-450”5Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 4 (1954-1961)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the B-450 and the Universal-4 (4 DM).
Which is faster on the road?26 km/h (16.2 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-450”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 4 (1954-1961)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-450”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 4 (1954-1961)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the B-450 and the Universal-4 (4 DM).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC B-450”; Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-450”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 4 (1954-1961)”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1958–19691954–1961EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Nuffield Universal-4 (4 DM) has 101% more hydraulic flow (13.7 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the International Harvester B-450 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester B-450 is 18% heavier (407 kg / 897 lb) than the Nuffield Universal-4 (4 DM) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the B-450 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Universal-4 (4 DM) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the B-450: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IHC B-450”); the Universal-4 (4 DM): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Nuffield Universal 4 (1954-1961)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources