International Harvester B-275 or J.I. Case 441?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the J.I. Case 441: hydraulic flow.

  • The J.I. Case 441 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 42% (9.5 L/min / 2.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for International Harvester B-275 and J.I. Case 441, with the call on each
QuestionB-275441Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?24.1 kW (32.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-275”24.3 kW (32.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 441”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the B-275 and the 441.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the B-275 and the 441.
Which pumps more oil for implements?22.7 L/min (6.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-275”32.2 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 441”AheadThe J.I. Case 441 has 42% more hydraulic flow (9.5 L/min / 2.5 gpm) than the International Harvester B-275 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the B-275 and the 441.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,569 kg (3,459 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC B-275”1,642 kg (3,620 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 441”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the B-275 and the 441.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “IHC B-275”4 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 441”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the B-275 and the 441.
Which is faster on the road?22 km/h (13.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC B-275”20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 441”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC B-275”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 441”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-275”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 441”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC B-275”; Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-275”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 441”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1958–19611960–1969EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The J.I. Case 441 has 42% more hydraulic flow (9.5 L/min / 2.5 gpm) than the International Harvester B-275 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources