International Harvester 986 or ZETOR 16045?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the International Harvester 986 is ahead on hydraulic flow and PTO speeds; the ZETOR 16045 is ahead on three-point lift.

  • The International Harvester 986 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 540 rpm.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for International Harvester 986 and ZETOR 16045, with the call on each
Question98616045Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?77.7 kW (104.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 986”77.1 kW (103.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16045”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 986 and the 16045.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 986 and the 16045.
Which pumps more oil for implements?45.4 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 986”35.2 L/min (9.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16045”AheadThe International Harvester 986 has 29% more hydraulic flow (10.2 L/min / 2.7 gpm) than the ZETOR 16045 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,655 kg (5,853 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 986”4,867 kg (10,730 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16045”AheadThe ZETOR 16045 has 83% more lift (2,212 kg / 4,877 lb) than the International Harvester 986 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,910 kg (13,029 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 986”4,990 kg (11,001 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16045”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 986 is 18% heavier (920 kg / 2,028 lb) than the ZETOR 16045 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 986 and the 16045.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 986”12Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16045”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 986 and the 16045.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 986”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16045”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 986”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16045”AheadThe International Harvester 986 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 16045 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 986 and the 16045.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 986”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16045”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1976–19811980–1984EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The International Harvester 986 has 29% more hydraulic flow (10.2 L/min / 2.7 gpm) than the ZETOR 16045 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 16045 has 83% more lift (2,212 kg / 4,877 lb) than the International Harvester 986 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 986 is 18% heavier (920 kg / 2,028 lb) than the ZETOR 16045 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 986 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 16045 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources