International Harvester 966 vs SAME Buffalo DT

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

International Harvester 966

1971–1974

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

SAME Buffalo DT

1968–1974

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

We will not advise between these two machines, because the drive differs (2WD; 4WD). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.

Field by field

11 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

International Harvester 966 and SAME Buffalo DT, field by field
Field966Buffalo DTGap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed95.6 hp103.5 hp+8% Buffalo DT
Engine declaredINTERNATIONAL HARVESTER D-414SAME DA 1006-Vdiffers
Displacement declared6.78 L5.66 L+20% 966
Maximum torque declared305 lb·ft · 414 N·m280 lb·ft · 380 N·m+9% 966
Transmission
Top speed declared18.6 mph · 30 km/h15.5 mph · 25 km/h+20% 966
Clutch declaredPedal-operated DYNA-LIFE clutchPedal-operated dry SAME single-disc clutchdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared7.9 gpm · 30.0 L/min
Three-point lift at ends declared5,000 lb · 2,268 kg6,614 lb · 3,000 kg+32% Buffalo DT
Rear PTO speeds declared540/1000 rpm540/1000 rpm
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared11,625 lb · 5,273 kg9,524 lb · 4,320 kg+22% 966
Wheelbase declared104.8 in · 2,662 mm100.8 in · 2,560 mm
Length declared165.0 in · 4,191 mm157.5 in · 4,000 mm
Width declared98.0 in · 2,489 mm85.8 in · 2,180 mm+14% 966
Height declared105.0 in · 2,667 mm75.6 in · 1,920 mm+39% 966
Ground clearance declared14.0 in · 356 mm17.3 in · 440 mm+24% Buffalo DT
Turning radius, braked declared11.8 ft · 3.61 m16.4 ft · 5.00 m+39% Buffalo DT
Fuel tank declared147.9 qt · 140.0 L

International Harvester 966 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 966”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 966”

SAME Buffalo DT sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo”