International Harvester 955 or Renault 891 (S)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 955 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 891 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The International Harvester 955 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 31% (10.0 L/min / 2.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 26% (885 kg / 1,951 lb) more three-point lift.
- The International Harvester 955 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
- The International Harvester 955 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 955 | 891 (S) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 65.9 kW (88.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 955” | 65.5 kW (87.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 955 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 891 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 955 and the 891 (S). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 955 and the 891 (S). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 42.6 L/min (11.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 955” | 32.6 L/min (8.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681” | AheadThe International Harvester 955 has 31% more hydraulic flow (10.0 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the Renault 891 (S) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,325 kg (9,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 955” | 3,440 kg (7,584 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681” | AheadThe International Harvester 955 has 26% more lift (885 kg / 1,951 lb) than the Renault 891 (S) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,090 kg (9,017 lb) to 4,585 kg (10,108 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 955” | 3,950 kg (8,708 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 955 and the 891 (S). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | — | 12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681” | No figureNo call on forward gears: no figure on record for the 955. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 955. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 955” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681” | AheadThe International Harvester 955 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 891 (S) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 955” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 955 and the 891 (S). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 955” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681” | AheadThe International Harvester 955 is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 891 (S) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1977–1982 | 1977–1982 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester 955 has 31% more hydraulic flow (10.0 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the Renault 891 (S) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 955 has 26% more lift (885 kg / 1,951 lb) than the Renault 891 (S) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 955 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 891 (S) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 955 is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 891 (S) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 955 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 891 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, forward gears, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources