International Harvester 886 or Massey Ferguson MF 698?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 886 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 698 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for International Harvester 886 and Massey Ferguson MF 698, with the call on each
Question886MF 698Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?64.7 kW (86.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 886”65 kW (87 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 698”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 886 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 698 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 886 and the MF 698.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 886 and the MF 698.
Which pumps more oil for implements?No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 886 and the MF 698.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 886”3,275 kg (7,220 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 698”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 886: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 886”); the MF 698: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 698”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,325 kg (11,740 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 886”3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 698”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 886 is 52% heavier (1,825 kg / 4,023 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 698 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 886 and the MF 698.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 886”12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 698”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 886 and the MF 698.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 886”29.1 km/h (18.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 698”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 886”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 698”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 886 and the MF 698.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 886”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 698”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1976–19811982–1984Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 698 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The International Harvester 886 is 52% heavier (1,825 kg / 4,023 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 698 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 698 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 886 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 698 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 886: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 886”); the MF 698: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 698”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources