International Harvester 786 vs Massey Ferguson MF 3070 (A)

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1980–1981

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1986–1993

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 786 and the MF 3070 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

International Harvester 786 and Massey Ferguson MF 3070 (A), field by field
Field	786	MF 3070 (A)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	79.9 hp	88.8 hp	+11% MF 3070 (A)
Engine declared	INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER D-358	Perkins AT 4.236 LJ	differs
Displacement declared	5.87 L	3.86 L	+52% 786
Maximum torque declared	251 lb·ft · 340 N·m	242 lb·ft · 328 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Pedal operated DYNA-LIFE clutch	Pedal operated dry air-cooled VALEO single plate clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	12.0 gpm · 45.5 L/min	13.5 gpm · 51.1 L/min	+12% MF 3070 (A)
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	8,340 lb · 3,783 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	11,590 lb · 5,257 kg	8,598 lb · 3,900 kg	+35% 786
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	14,991 lb · 6,800 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	104.8 in · 2,662 mm	96.9 in · 2,460 mm	+8% 786
Length declared	165.0 in · 4,191 mm	159.4 in · 4,048 mm	—
Width declared	102.0 in · 2,591 mm	74.4 in · 1,889 mm	+37% 786
Height declared	112.0 in · 2,845 mm	107.2 in · 2,724 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	13.0 in · 330 mm	16.0 in · 407 mm	+23% MF 3070 (A)
Turning radius, braked declared	11.9 ft · 3.63 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	199.7 qt · 189.0 L	182.8 qt · 173.0 L	+9% 786

Source

Source