International Harvester 784 vs Massey Ferguson MF 3050 E

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1977–1981

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1988–1995

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 784 and the MF 3050 E → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

International Harvester 784 and Massey Ferguson MF 3050 E, field by field
Field	784	MF 3050 E	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	75.9 hp	70.1 hp	+8% 784
Engine declared	INTERNATIONAL-HARVESTER D-246	Perkins A 4.236 LD	differs
Displacement declared	4.03 L	3.86 L	—
Maximum torque declared	159 lb·ft · 216 N·m	187 lb·ft · 253 N·m	+17% MF 3050 E
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	—
Clutch declared	—	pedal-operated, dry and air-cooled VALEO single-plate clutch	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	10.1 gpm · 38.2 L/min	—	—
Pressure declared	2,698 psi · 186 bar	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	4,608 lb · 2,090 kg	6,351 lb · 2,881 kg	+38% MF 3050 E
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	5,238 lb · 2,376 kg	7,848 lb · 3,560 kg	+50% MF 3050 E
Wheelbase declared	88.0 in · 2,235 mm	93.3 in · 2,371 mm	+6% MF 3050 E
Length declared	144.1 in · 3,660 mm	155.5 in · 3,950 mm	+8% MF 3050 E
Width declared	68.9 in · 1,750 mm	78.3 in · 1,990 mm	+14% MF 3050 E
Height declared	100.4 in · 2,550 mm	103.1 in · 2,620 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	15.6 in · 396 mm	14.6 in · 370 mm	+7% 784
Turning radius, braked declared	11.5 ft · 3.51 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	81.4 qt · 77.0 L	156.4 qt · 148.0 L	+92% MF 3050 E

Source

Source