International Harvester 766 or SAME Ariete (DT)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 766 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ariete (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The International Harvester 766 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 63% (17.5 L/min / 4.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 766 | Ariete (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 58.8 kW (78.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 766” | 58.3 kW (78.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Ariete 480” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 766 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ariete (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 766 and the Ariete (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 766 and the Ariete (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 45.5 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 766” | 28.0 L/min (7.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Ariete 480” | AheadThe International Harvester 766 has 63% more hydraulic flow (17.5 L/min / 4.6 gpm) than the SAME Ariete (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Ariete 480” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 766. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,144 kg (11,341 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 766” | 3,240 kg (7,143 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Ariete 480” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 766 is 59% heavier (1,904 kg / 4,198 lb) than the SAME Ariete (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 766 and the Ariete (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 766” | 8 to 14Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Ariete 480” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 766 and the Ariete (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 766” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Ariete 480” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 766” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Ariete 480” | AheadThe International Harvester 766 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SAME Ariete (DT) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 766 and the Ariete (DT). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 766” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Ariete 480” | AheadThe SAME Ariete (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester 766 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1971–1973 | 1963–1973 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 766 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester 766 has 63% more hydraulic flow (17.5 L/min / 4.6 gpm) than the SAME Ariete (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 766 is 59% heavier (1,904 kg / 4,198 lb) than the SAME Ariete (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 766 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SAME Ariete (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The SAME Ariete (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester 766 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The International Harvester 766 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 766 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ariete (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources