International Harvester 745 XL(A) or J.I. Case 870?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 745 XL(A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 870 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The J.I. Case 870 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 95% (29.6 L/min / 7.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The International Harvester 745 XL(A) suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 745 XL(A) | 870 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 52.7 kW (70.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 745XL” | 52.7 kW (70.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 870” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 745 XL(A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 870 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 745 XL(A) and the 870. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 745 XL(A) and the 870. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 31.0 L/min (8.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 745XL” | 60.6 L/min (16.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 870” | AheadThe J.I. Case 870 has 95% more hydraulic flow (29.6 L/min / 7.8 gpm) than the International Harvester 745 XL(A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,151 kg (6,947 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 745XL” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 870. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,430 kg (7,562 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 745XL” | 4,175 kg (9,204 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 870” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 870 is 22% heavier (745 kg / 1,642 lb) than the International Harvester 745 XL(A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,500 kg (12,125 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 745XL” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 870. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 745XL” | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 870” | AheadThe International Harvester 745 XL(A) has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the J.I. Case 870 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 745 XL(A) and the 870. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 745XL” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 870” | AheadThe International Harvester 745 XL(A) has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the J.I. Case 870 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 745XL” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 870” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 745XL” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 870” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 745XL” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 870” | AheadThe International Harvester 745 XL(A) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 870 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1981–1990 | 1969–1973 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 745 XL(A) is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The J.I. Case 870 has 95% more hydraulic flow (29.6 L/min / 7.8 gpm) than the International Harvester 745 XL(A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 870 is 22% heavier (745 kg / 1,642 lb) than the International Harvester 745 XL(A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 745 XL(A) has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the J.I. Case 870 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 745 XL(A) has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the J.I. Case 870 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 745 XL(A) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 870 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The International Harvester 745 XL(A) is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 745 XL(A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 870 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources