International Harvester 585 or Massey Ferguson MF 363 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 585 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 363 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson 363 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 20% (405 kg / 893 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Massey Ferguson 363 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for International Harvester 585 and Massey Ferguson MF 363 (A), with the call on each
Question585MF 363 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?43.4 kW (58.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 585 (XL)”43 kW (58 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 585 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 363 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 585 and the MF 363 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 585 and the MF 363 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?——No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 585 and the MF 363 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,995 kg (4,398 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 585 (XL)”2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 363 (A) has 20% more lift (405 kg / 893 lb) than the International Harvester 585 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 585 (XL)”2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 585 is 21% heavier (500 kg / 1,102 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 363 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 585 and the MF 363 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 585 (XL)”12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?—YesTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 585.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 585 (XL)”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 363 (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the International Harvester 585 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 585 (XL)”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 585 and the MF 363 (A).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 585 (XL)”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 363”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1981–19901987–1994Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 363 (A) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson 363 (A) has 20% more lift (405 kg / 893 lb) than the International Harvester 585 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 585 is 21% heavier (500 kg / 1,102 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 363 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 363 (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the International Harvester 585 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 363 (A) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 585 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 363 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources