International Harvester 544 or SOMECA 615 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 544 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 615 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The International Harvester 544 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 118% (24.6 L/min / 6.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The SOMECA 615 (DT) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 17% (382 kg / 842 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
  • The International Harvester 544 suits road haulage better on this data: 36% (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for International Harvester 544 and SOMECA 615 (DT), with the call on each
Question544615 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 544”38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 615”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 544 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 615 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 544 and the 615 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 544 and the 615 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?45.4 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 544”20.8 L/min (5.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 615”AheadThe International Harvester 544 has 118% more hydraulic flow (24.6 L/min / 6.5 gpm) than the SOMECA 615 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,080 kg (4,586 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 615”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 544.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,258 kg (4,978 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 544”2,640 kg (5,820 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 615”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SOMECA 615 (DT) is 17% heavier (382 kg / 842 lb) than the International Harvester 544 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 544 and the 615 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 544”7 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 615”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the International Harvester 544 is stepless (CVT) and the SOMECA 615 (DT) has 7 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 544 and the 615 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 544”22 km/h (13.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 615”AheadThe International Harvester 544 has 36% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the SOMECA 615 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 544”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 615”AheadThe International Harvester 544 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SOMECA 615 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 544”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 615”AheadThe SOMECA 615 (DT) has an independent PTO; the International Harvester 544’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 544”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 615”AheadThe SOMECA 615 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester 544 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1968–19731965–1968EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The International Harvester 544 has 118% more hydraulic flow (24.6 L/min / 6.5 gpm) than the SOMECA 615 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The SOMECA 615 (DT) is 17% heavier (382 kg / 842 lb) than the International Harvester 544 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 544 has 36% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the SOMECA 615 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 544 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SOMECA 615 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The SOMECA 615 (DT) has an independent PTO; the International Harvester 544’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
  • The SOMECA 615 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester 544 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the International Harvester 544 is stepless (CVT) and the SOMECA 615 (DT) has 7 forward gears — not called.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 544 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 615 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources